Efro is keeping the conversation about feelings instead of facts and evidence. He “..want(s) to assume innocence”? How about stop assuming guilt, and demonstrate Brian played 16 cards, or else question your assumptions? But let’s explore his statement.
It isn’t difficult to prove Brian ran a 16 card SB. Only one person has to say he used D2D, in just one game. And that’s if you set the bar so low that you don’t ask for corroboration. Yet none of his opponents, none of the observing crowd, nor anyone else has said that happened. Let that sink in. Brian never used D2D.
Efro almost realizes the implications around 1:40:00 when he asks what Brian thought he’d do with two CoP in the finals, but then concludes that Brian is willing to cheat in a way Efro recognizes couldn’t ever actually work. Wait, what?
Knowing Brian could have brought the two CoP for the photo and sided in D2D in secret, Efro believes instead Brian decided to put his secret 16th card into a photo, guaranteeing he’d be caught. Yet despite how insane that whole scenario sounds, Efro would have you believe he, “..want(s) to assume innocence.” Well I don’t know what Efro wants, but what he’s actually doing is assuming guilt and stupidity simultaneously.
The truth is, this entire thing isn’t about actual game play, as Brian played a 15 card SB from start to finish. Nobody disputes that.
No, this fight is about a card in a photo. That’s what the entire cheating allegations actually boil down to: that Brian didn’t take the photo how it was expected he would, and that it therefore constitutes cheating despite having no impact on actual game play.
That, and Efro trying to make the rest of us assume guilt without evidence. By if that looks bad for Efro, don’t worry. He, “..want(s) to assume innocence.” Right?
Efro is keeping the conversation about feelings instead of facts and evidence. He “..want(s) to assume innocence”? How about stop assuming guilt, and demonstrate Brian played 16 cards, or else question your assumptions? But let’s explore his statement.
It isn’t difficult to prove Brian ran a 16 card SB. Only one person has to say he used D2D, in just one game. And that’s if you set the bar so low that you don’t ask for corroboration. Yet none of his opponents, none of the observing crowd, nor anyone else has said that happened. Let that sink in. Brian never used D2D.
Efro almost realizes the implications around 1:40:00 when he asks what Brian thought he’d do with two CoP in the finals, but then concludes that Brian is willing to cheat in a way Efro recognizes couldn’t ever actually work. Wait, what?
Knowing Brian could have brought the two CoP for the photo and sided in D2D in secret, Efro believes instead Brian decided to put his secret 16th card into a photo, guaranteeing he’d be caught. Yet despite how insane that whole scenario sounds, Efro would have you believe he, “..want(s) to assume innocence.” Well I don’t know what Efro wants, but what he’s actually doing is assuming guilt and stupidity simultaneously.
The truth is, this entire thing isn’t about actual game play, as Brian played a 15 card SB from start to finish. Nobody disputes that.
No, this fight is about a card in a photo. That’s what the entire cheating allegations actually boil down to: that Brian didn’t take the photo how it was expected he would, and that it therefore constitutes cheating despite having no impact on actual game play.
That, and Efro trying to make the rest of us assume guilt without evidence. By if that looks bad for Efro, don’t worry. He, “..want(s) to assume innocence.” Right?